|
|
LAC - NYJ
Nov 2, 2023 22:09:16 GMT
via mobile
Post by Chargers - Billy on Nov 2, 2023 22:09:16 GMT
Chargers trade Skyy Moore $1.47 / $1.76 / $2.05
J-E-T-S trade 2024 NYJ 2nd and 2025 GB 1st
I agree. I’m not seeing it with Skyy
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark - Jets on Nov 2, 2023 22:15:42 GMT
Accept. Thanks Billy. Talk again down the road
|
|
|
|
Post by Steelers GM on Nov 3, 2023 16:37:35 GMT
Veto 0-1. I don't see how Skyy Moore is worth a 1st + 2nd package. Hasn't shown he can be a solid, consistent WR in the NFL, IMO.
|
|
|
|
LAC - NYJ
Nov 4, 2023 16:08:15 GMT
via mobile
Post by New Orleans Saints (Lars) on Nov 4, 2023 16:08:15 GMT
While I do agree with Pitt that he's hasn't shown that value I do see the value in age, contract and current team so I will vote to pass
1-1
|
|
|
|
LAC - NYJ
Nov 4, 2023 17:36:49 GMT
via mobile
Post by buffalobills on Nov 4, 2023 17:36:49 GMT
1-2 Veto
I have no issue approving this deal but if we let this type then what’s the point of voting on deals since you’ll be lucky to get a 2nd for Moore since he’s haven’t done much to be worth more then that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark - Jets on Nov 4, 2023 18:01:10 GMT
You have no issue approving the trade and then you veto it? Did you veto because we are in the same division?
This trade is about potential. Projected as a 2nd round pick in real life, first year and playing in KC. As Lars could see, it is about age, contract and the team he is on.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark - Jets on Nov 4, 2023 18:01:38 GMT
I will not go gently into that good night
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark - Jets on Nov 4, 2023 18:02:51 GMT
And no Francis, I am not accusing of vetoing it because we are in the same division.
|
|
|
|
LAC - NYJ
Nov 4, 2023 20:24:47 GMT
via mobile
Post by vikings on Nov 4, 2023 20:24:47 GMT
Veto this is a horribly lopsided deal. This js why we have a voting process
|
|
|
|
LAC - NYJ
Nov 4, 2023 20:48:34 GMT
via mobile
Post by Cardinals on Nov 4, 2023 20:48:34 GMT
Veto 1-4
I just dont think a 1st is needed here. That just doesn’t make sense for me unfortunately
|
|
|
|
LAC - NYJ
Nov 4, 2023 21:06:37 GMT
via mobile
Post by Indianapolis Colts on Nov 4, 2023 21:06:37 GMT
Approve
2-4
I don't think we're being consistent when it comes to stepping in on lopsided trades, so can't see why this one is getting vetoed
|
|
|
|
Post by New Orleans Saints (Lars) on Nov 5, 2023 0:51:06 GMT
With an overwhelming number of votes against this trade, it will be officially vetoed
|
|
