|
|
Post by Green Bay Packers on May 4, 2023 18:41:58 GMT
Buff Trades
D. Ridder 1.22,1.46,1.71- 2023-2025
B.Hopkins 2.5,1.6,1.5- 2023-2025
Amik Robertson 0.5,0.5-2023-2024
2023 2.05
For
M. Parsons- 4.66,5.43,TO-2023-2025
K. Pitts- 8.98,10.47,TO-2023-2025
A. Pierce-1.5,1.8.2.1-2023-2025
GB makes this trade to get a QB. And an early 2nd. With not wanting to jump into the UFA for one and not one of the top 5 picks had to get a QB. Also grab a young TE and CB with upside, I hope. Hope to use the draft to replace Parsons and Pitts. Thanks, Buff, for some great talks to make this happen. Best of luck in 2023
|
|
|
|
Post by buffalobills on May 4, 2023 19:15:21 GMT
Buff Trades D. Ridder 1.22,1.46,1.71- 2023-2025 B.Hopkins 2.5,1.6,1.5- 2023-2025 Amik Robertson 0.5,0.5-2023-2024 2023 2.05 For M. Parsons- 4.66,5.43,TO-2023-2025 K. Pitts- 8.98,10.47,TO-2023-2025 A. Pierce-1.5,1.8.2.1-2023-2025 GB makes this trade to get a QB. And an early 2nd. With not wanting to jump into the UFA for one and not one of the top 5 picks had to get a QB. Also grab a young TE and CB with upside, I hope. Hope to use the draft to replace Parsons and Pitts. Thanks, Buff, for some great talks to make this happen. Best of luck in 2023 I accept this deal, Reasoning: Looking to compete this year and this deal helps me in that department. I was also looking to strengthen my TE and my WR. I‘m able to trade Radder since I already own a top QB but young QB are never cheap. Wasn’t expecting to trade a young TE lime hopkins but he ask for him and agreed. He’s a talented TE with 3 years left on his contract. Amik is another one I wasn’t happy adding to this deal but at the end of the day if you want something, you need to give back which I did. Thx for taking the time to negotiate with me and I wish you a great day!! |
|
|
|
Post by Mark - Jets on May 4, 2023 20:52:21 GMT
I think adding the values and potentials of Hopkins and Robertson to the deal brings it closer to even than it was before to the point I would not veto
Approval #1
|
|
|
|
Post by New Orleans Saints (Lars) on May 6, 2023 13:43:17 GMT
I still don't like this trade but I believe it's somewhat closer in a matter of speaking but both the CB and TE are backups. That being said, I really hate to veto especially the same trade twice so I'll give GB the benefit of the doubt but we'll see what the league says
Approve 2-0
|
|
|
|
Post by Cardinals - Kyle on May 6, 2023 13:49:54 GMT
I’m sorry but I’ll have to veto this one and this will have big ramifications on both teams and the league. This is the type of trade you can do if your only need is a qb. You’re giving away talents that could be top 5 in their respective positions. This is also very risky for a team like the Packers since Ridder might be gone after this year. If you really want to do this deal, you can make it halfway throughout the season once you get a good watch of what Ridder can do and if he can stay as the qb moving forward.
Veto 1-2
|
|
|
|
Post by buffalobills on May 6, 2023 15:42:48 GMT
The votes are 2-1
Let’s get more votes gentleman’s!!
|
|
|
|
Post by patriots on May 6, 2023 16:19:02 GMT
veto - for what kyle said
|
|
|
|
Post by Bucs GM on May 6, 2023 16:20:58 GMT
Veto. Buffalo giving up way too little for that package of players
|
|
|
|
Post by Dave-Commanders on May 6, 2023 16:26:43 GMT
Veto. I consider Parsons to be elite. Ridder is mediocre at best. Not a good trade, especially for a new owner in the league
|
|
|
|
Post by Steelers GM on May 6, 2023 16:37:47 GMT
Still a veto from me. Those players don’t change the trade at all for me
|
|
|
|
Post by Indianapolis Colts on May 6, 2023 20:44:08 GMT
Trading Ridder and a 2nd would be be fair value for either Parsons or Pitts. Getting them together with Pierce thrown in when you're sending back the backup TE in LA and a backup corner in LV, is a no
2-6
Had to edit my last post since I'm high off cold medicine and confused which league this was in for a second when it came to the draft pick
|
|
